March 17, 2025
11 11 11 AM
Latest Post
Bitcoin, S&P 500 Take Backseat to Stagflation Trade as Trump Tariffs Threaten to Derail Growth Ether in Structural Decline, Year-End Price Target Slashed to $4K: Standard Chartered CoinDesk 20 Performance Update: Solana (SOL) Falls 3.9%, Leading Index Lower Digital Asset Investment Outflow Extends Into Fifth Week ECB’s Villeroy Says U.S. Crypto Support Could Trigger Next Financial Emergency Strategy Leverages STRK ATM to Acquire 130 More Bitcoin After Four Straight Monday Declines, What’s on the Cards for Bitcoin? Crypto Daybook Americas: Recession Concerns Stifle BTC Recovery Prospects, Memecoins Buzz Bitcoin Faces Massive ‘Supply Gap’ Between $70K and $80K South Korea Cuts Out Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Considerations: Report

U.S. Prosecutors Ask Court to Green-Light Return of 95,000 Stolen Bitcoin to Bitfinex

U.S. prosecutors have asked a federal judge to green-light the return of nearly 80% of the 119,754 bitcoins stolen in the 2016 hack of crypto exchange Bitfinex.

In a Tuesday court filing, prosecutors said the 94,643 bitcoins recovered by the government from the original wallet used by the hacker, Ilya Lichtenstein, can be paid to Bitfinex as restitution in-kind once the court gives the go-ahead. The Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Satoshi Vision and Bitcoin Gold generated via several hard forks following the hack will also be sent to Bitfinex.

Last November, Lichtenstein was sentenced to 5 years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering in 2023. His wife, Heather Morgan – better known by her rap moniker Razzlekhan – received an 18-month sentence for helping Lichtenstein to launder a portion of the hack proceeds. Both agreed to forfeit the stolen cryptocurrency as part of their plea agreements.

Returning the remaining 25,000 bitcoins will be more complicated.

In their filing, prosecutors said that, because Lichtenstein and Morgan attempted to launder those coins via a “variety of complex and technologically sophisticated means, including laundering through extensive peel chain transactions, non-compliant virtual currency exchanges, darknet markets, and mixers and tumblers, as well as commingling in the defendants’ business and personal accounts” they cannot be characterized as the “specific property” lost in the hack and must therefore be returned via an ancillary forfeiture proceeding.

This post was originally published on this site